Monthly Archives: January 2017

Bridging the Data Disconnect Between the Back and Front Offices

Patrick Orlando, as part of a panel at TSAM Boston, highlights why it is so critical for business users to engage in the earliest phases of a data management platform implementation.

Patrick Orlando, Principal Consultant, Eagle Investment Systems


This past November, as part of a data management panel at TSAM Boston, a member of the audience inquired about one of the biggest challenges facing most data professionals: The sometimes glaring disconnect between the back-office teams providing data and the front-office users that are often unsure how to turn this information into actionable intelligence that informs both business strategies and investment decisions. The consensus among those of us on the panel was that more often than not, issues such as these extend all the way back to implementation and the earliest stages of standing up a data management platform.

This was a topic that seemed to be of particular interest at the event, which was held in Boston on November 16. A TSAM survey of senior executives ahead of the conference revealed that over half are currently planning to replace legacy systems and technology during the next 12 months, while nearly a third (30.5%) identified plans to introduce a new data governance strategy. This budding level of interest was evident during our panel, “Transforming Your Firm Into an Information-Centric Organization,” as we spoke to a packed room of delegates.

Read More…

Addressing the ESG Data Challenge

In his new blog, Eagle’s Australian-based Director of Client Services, Manu Sathananthavel, discusses the growing prominence of ESG factors in the investment process and the accompanying data challenges this presents. He reveals how a data-centric approach can help firms effectively integrate and ensure the quality of ESG data and highlights how Eagle’s clients, such as First State Investments, are using Eagle for their ESG reporting.

Manu Sathananthavel, Director of Client Services – Australia


In recent years, we have witnessed a surge in interest in environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations among asset managers. Despite attempts to define and standardise ESG factors, most notably by the United Nations which set up the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) in 2006, best practice still hasn’t fully emerged and reporting from region to region remains inconsistent. Furthermore, there is little consensus around the measurement of ESG factors, scoring and definitions many of which are more subjective than other performance measures, and there is little in the way of formal regulation to shape that consensus. As a result, the collection and reconciliation of high quality data are among the key challenges facing asset managers as they look to improve their ESG reporting.

Interest in ESG and impact investing is being driven by a number of factors. First, asset owners and investors are keen to have a positive impact on society and the environment. Issues like climate change have forced their way up the agenda in recent years while high-profile man-made environmental disasters such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 and the Vale/BHP Billiton iron mine collapse in Brazil in 2015 have also brought ESG into sharper focus for investors.

Read More…

 Scroll to top