Monthly Archives: April 2017

Vendor Relationships in the Time of Consolidation: Are Your Vendors in it for the Long Haul?

The impending sunset of Barclays POINT was prominent at the recent FTF Performance Measurement Americas (PMA) conference, underscoring the long-term risks of a short-term focus on software

Jeff Cullen, Solutions Principal


While most performance system RFPs focus on a given product’s user interface or the specific features that are built directly into the software, organizations should also consider the potential for technology debt, which stems from distributed systems and the unhealthy dependencies that often develop with their presence. I recently participated in a panel at the FTF PMA conference in New York entitled “How to Justify System Migration Pain”, and this was a theme that seemed to be top of mind among the panelists following the recent consolidation among fintech vendors that underscored this growing challenge.

The discussion also featured Jeffrey Malmin, General Director, Performance Reporting at John Hancock Investments; Shankar Venkatraman, Director, Global Head of Performance, Risk, Analytics and Compliance at Citi; Jeremy Welch, Head of US Hub Operations at BNP Paribas; and Jeffrey Bellavance, Manager Performance and Analytics at PanAgora Asset Management.

One takeaway from the event resonated with me as the sole vendor on the panel: The consistent recognition that investment firms and asset managers aren’t simply buying software anymore, they’re entering into a relationship with their vendor.

Read More…

Taking Control of Your Investment Operations

Ravi Patel, Solution Specialist


Operating under cost pressures, reduced margins and tough competition, the manufacturing industry has constantly adopted lean operations to eliminate waste of resources and time. Adopting automated process governance across stock control to bill of materials & final packaging, provides an early diagnostic, helps eliminate defects and improves overall operational efficiency for manufacturers. Ultimately this helps them to control costs, meet quality standards, and maintain consistency and reliability of their end product

Lean operations in the manufacturing industry is an example that many Investment Managers could benefit from when it comes to their middle and back office operations. This understanding resonated well with the assembled crowd at TSAM London, where I presented Eagle’s Control Centre. My conversations with various delegates at TSAM confirmed that the reality for investment operations and accounting teams today is very different. Due to silos of disparate legacy systems, they are forced into adopting fragmented manual workflows, which are causing considerable data quality challenges and reconciliation overhead.

Resource intensive manual intervention such as ledger to sub-ledger reconciliation, NAV impact checklists, NAV reconciliation and market data variances regularly cause delays to the valuation process. The reactive nature of such manual workflows often reveals upstream data quality issues once valuations are calculated. Today, these issues are identified late in the process by performing in-depth root cause analysis, causing loss of productivity and often missed SLAs.

Read More…

A Journey Through the Evolution of Buy-Side Investment Data Management

Marc Rubenfeld, CIPM, Head of Eagle Solutions EMEA/APAC


At the recent TSAM London event, I had the honour of chairing the data management conference stream. This involved moderating debates, introducing speakers and facilitating conversation throughout the day. In preparation for the event, I began thinking about the history of data management and what I have seen as the stages in its evolution within buy-side investment managers.

Each new innovation or concept in data management has followed a similar evolutionary path, starting with awareness or recognition around the concept itself. Then follows a ripple of early adopters that look to build their own solutions, before vendors step in to refine and improve the innovation with commercial solutions. Over time, these vendor solutions can offer even more cost savings in the form of a managed service.

Over time, with each new innovation, the period it takes to evolve has contracted as firms have become quicker to embrace new concepts and vendors more agile in reacting to client needs. To illustrate this, I put together the diagram below, based on the design of the London Underground map. The horizontal line roughly approximates time and each evolutionary stage is represented as a station.

Read More…

 Scroll to top